Thursday, June 4, 2009

Letting patients have their say

Dr. Pauline Chen's column this week focuses on a conversation with health quality expert Dr. Donald M. Berwick. Dr. Berwick advocates a radical change in how health care is delivered in this country to a system that is truly patient-centered. As it stands now, the system is physician-centered; everything from how the hospital gowns to the set up of medical records is set for the convenience of the physician. But such physician-centered care creates passivity in patients, when numerous studies and experience show that active and engaged patients have better health outcomes.

But advocating a radical shift to patient-centered care and decision-making raises questions about the burden on the patients. Physicians train for years to learn evidence-based medicine and best practices. Is it fair or responsible to ask a patient with no medical training to weigh and make major decisions about their care, especially when they are sick?

It seems that the ultimate goal of patient-centered care is that the patient would have an active voice in the planning of their care. That is not to say that the patient does the physician's job, but that the patient and physician are able to openly communicate about the reasons for and against a course of treatment and both are able to come to and understand a decision for treatment. Effective and on-going communication and trust are fundamental to this process. If a patient doesn't understand the reason for a treatment or doesn't trust the physician's skills and intentions, then neither the patient nor the physician is going to get anywhere near quality of care and outcomes.

2 comments:

Peg said...

I was lead to your blogs via Google Alert. Yours is one I find interesting, intelligent, and topical. I would like to comment on a few of your points. I am not in health care, I am a medical consumer.
My experience with the medical establishment, and those of my spirited sisters, over the past 6 years or so qualify me as an "expert" consumer in the cancer arena. Now, with aging parents I am finding myself becoming an expert in the arena of advanced dimentia. The "conditions" may be different, but the advocacy needed is similar.
I am familiar with Dr. Berwick and even tried to get to meet with him after an article in the Boston Globe referenced him. My efforts were futile.
I applaud his desires to make the whole experience of health delivery more "patient centric". These ideas of giving some control to the patient are not threateing, nor are they unimaginable. This is a concept that will take years to implement, but implementing them must happen. With the current health care situation in USA being in such a dismal state, wouldn't NOW be an oportune time to introduce some of his ideas? I know when my sister and I were going through cancer treatments (one on one coast, one on the other!), any little control we could find to help us "own" our disease was welcome. Acupuncture, reikki, massage, exercise, diet, meditation, prayer,getting 2nd or 3rd opinions, researching complimentary therapies, all were things we could do to help US. For people who like to be in control, these were things we could do to try and get control of our bodies back from the cancer and the medical personnel.
I think people have to get as mad as hell and shout from the roof tops that they are, "mad as hell and are not going to take it anymore", be it the lousy health care system and it's ability to talk the talk but not walk the walk; or the war in Iraq and Afghanistan; or the complancecy we as a nation exhibit when we accept mediocrity in everything from TV shows to processed food to politicians.
My sisters and I decided we were, "not going to take it anymore" so started a company whose mission is to "enhance the environment in which people are asked to heal and recover". Our first project was to re-design and re-think the way hospital gowns are constructed and sold. Why not let the people bring their own?!As long as they are functional, why not? We receive numerous correspondence from people who tell us that not only do our clothing allow them to maintain their dignity and modesty, but being able to say "NO" to a hospital gown is empowering! Once they have rebelled in that small but significant way, can implementing some complimentary therapies, getting 2nd or 3rd opinions, and demanding more time and attention from the medical providers be far away??

Peg said...

Our revolutionary, fashionable, and functional garments are called Healing Threads and our company is Spirited Sisters Inc.